A, R v

A, R v

The acquittal was quashed and a re-trial ordered because new and compelling evidence, including multiple independent complaints of sexual misconduct by the respondent, was reliable, substantial, and highly probative of the rape allegation. The interests of justice required a re-trial, as the evidential context had changed significantly and a conviction was highly probable.

Parties
Prosecution: R; Respondent: A
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 December 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application to Quash Acquittal and Order Re Trial
Outcome
acquittal quashed; re-trial ordered
Legal Topics
Double Jeopardy, Re Trial, New and Compelling Evidence, Sexual Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Prosecution

A

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application to Quash Acquittal and Order Re Trial

  1. 1 Whether new and compelling evidence exists to justify quashing the acquittal and ordering a re-trial for rape under the Criminal Justice Act 2003
  2. 2 Whether the interests of justice require a re-trial given the evidential context and delay

Ratio Decidendi

The acquittal was quashed and a re-trial ordered because new and compelling evidence, including multiple independent complaints of sexual misconduct by the respondent, was reliable, substantial, and highly probative of the rape allegation. The interests of justice required a re-trial, as the evidential context had changed significantly and a conviction was highly probable.

Court Disposition

acquittal quashed; re-trial ordered

Orders

  • Acquittal of rape quashed
  • Respondent to be re-tried for rape