L v L (Child : Arrangements Following Treatment)
It is in N's best interests to make a child arrangements order now, providing for her to live with her father upon discharge and spend time with her mother subject to conditions, as certainty is essential for N's recovery and the mother is not currently capable of meeting N's needs.
- Parties
- Applicant: A (Father); First Respondent: B (Mother); Second Respondent: N (Child, through Children’s Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act Proceedings / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Child arrangements order made
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements Order, Welfare of the Child, Parental Responsibility, Mental Health Act Detention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A (Father)
Applicant
B (Mother)
First Respondent
N (Child, through Children’s Guardian)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Children Act Proceedings / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to make a child arrangements order now or defer until discharge
- 2 Which parent should N live with upon discharge
- 3 Appropriate arrangements for contact with mother
Ratio Decidendi
It is in N's best interests to make a child arrangements order now, providing for her to live with her father upon discharge and spend time with her mother subject to conditions, as certainty is essential for N's recovery and the mother is not currently capable of meeting N's needs.
Court Disposition
Child arrangements order made
Orders
- N shall live with her father upon discharge from hospital
- N shall spend time with her mother upon discharge, subject to directions and/or conditions to be determined in consultation with parents and professionals
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment