A v A [2024] EWFC 450 (B) (04 September 2024)
Given the court's findings of sexual abuse by the father against N, and ongoing denial of those findings, the welfare of N requires termination of the father's parental responsibility for her. For Ad and R, restriction of parental responsibility is justified only in relation to schooling, passports, and sharing of information to protect the mother and children, but not for major medical decisions. Section 91(14) order is justified for four years to protect the children from further litigation-induced harm. Contact with N is refused; indirect contact with Ad and R is permitted but only via mother-held communications until they are mature enough to decide. Prohibitive steps and...
- Citation
- [2024] EWFC 450 (B)
- Parties
- Claimant: A (Mother); Defendant: A (Father); Defendants: N, Ad, R (The Children)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Children and Non Molestation Orders / Final Judgment After Fact Finding and Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Orders granted as sought by mother and recommended by guardian, with modifications.
- Legal Topics
- Non Molestation Order, Prohibitive Steps Order, Child Arrangements Order, Termination of Parental Responsibility, Section 91(14) Order, Indirect Contact, Domestic Abuse, Sexual Abuse, Parental Responsibility Restriction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A (Mother)
Claimant
A (Father)
Defendant
N, Ad, R (The Children)
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Family Law Children and Non Molestation Orders / Final Judgment After Fact Finding and Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to terminate father's parental responsibility for N
- 2 Whether to restrict father's parental responsibility for Ad and R
- 3 Whether to make a Section 91(14) order and its duration
Ratio Decidendi
Given the court's findings of sexual abuse by the father against N, and ongoing denial of those findings, the welfare of N requires termination of the father's parental responsibility for her. For Ad and R, restriction of parental responsibility is justified only in relation to schooling, passports, and sharing of information to protect the mother and children, but not for major medical decisions. Section 91(14) order is justified for four years to protect the children from further litigation-induced harm. Contact with N is refused; indirect contact with Ad and R is permitted but only via mother-held communications until they are mature enough to decide. Prohibitive steps and...
Court Disposition
Orders granted as sought by mother and recommended by guardian, with modifications.
Orders
- Final 'live with' order in favour of mother for all children.
- No contact order between father and N.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment