A Local Authority v AF & Ors
The local authority failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that R's death or injuries were caused by suffocation or physical abuse by the parents, or that the mother failed to protect him. The evidence, including medical and wider contextual evidence, did not support the threshold for a care order under section 31(2)(b)(i) Children Act 1989.
- Parties
- Applicant: A Local Authority; First Respondent (mother): AF; Second Respondent (father): CB; Third Respondent (child): HB (by her children’s guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Fact Finding Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for care order dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Threshold Criteria, Child Abuse Allegations, Children Act 1989
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority
Applicant
AF
First Respondent (mother)
CB
Second Respondent (father)
HB (by her children’s guardian)
Third Respondent (child)
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Fact Finding Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the threshold for a care order under section 31(2)(b)(i) Children Act 1989 is met
- 2 Whether the death of R was caused by suffocation or physical abuse by the parents
- 3 Whether injuries to R were non-accidental
Ratio Decidendi
The local authority failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that R's death or injuries were caused by suffocation or physical abuse by the parents, or that the mother failed to protect him. The evidence, including medical and wider contextual evidence, did not support the threshold for a care order under section 31(2)(b)(i) Children Act 1989.
Court Disposition
Application for care order dismissed
Orders
- No care order made
- Local authority's allegations not proved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment