A & B (Children) (deaf parent - assessment and practice) [2021] EWFC 10 (09 February 2021)
The court held that, despite some deficiencies in the local authority's approach to making reasonable adjustments for the deaf parent, the threshold for care and placement orders was met and adoption was in the children's best interests. The court found that the local authority's failures did not amount to a breach that would prevent the making of the orders sought. The court emphasised the need for future compliance with obligations to disabled parents but concluded that the children's welfare required adoption.
- Citation
- [2021] EWFC 10
- Parties
- Applicant: A Local Authority; First Respondent: M; Second Respondent: F; Third and Fourth Respondents: A and B (by their guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Care and Placement Orders (family Law) / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Care and placement orders granted for both children; plan for adoption approved.
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Placement Orders, Adoption, Disability Discrimination, Procedural Fairness, Reasonable Adjustments, Deafness and Access to Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority
Applicant
M
First Respondent
F
Second Respondent
A and B (by their guardian)
Third and Fourth Respondents
Procedural Posture
Care and Placement Orders (family Law) / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the local authority and court made sufficient reasonable adjustments for a deaf parent under the Equality Act 2010
- 2 Whether the children should be placed for adoption or long-term foster care
- 3 Whether the local authority's assessments and support for the deaf parent were adequate and lawful
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, despite some deficiencies in the local authority's approach to making reasonable adjustments for the deaf parent, the threshold for care and placement orders was met and adoption was in the children's best interests. The court found that the local authority's failures did not amount to a breach that would prevent the making of the orders sought. The court emphasised the need for future compliance with obligations to disabled parents but concluded that the children's welfare required adoption.
Court Disposition
Care and placement orders granted for both children; plan for adoption approved.
Orders
- Care orders made for A and B.
- Placement orders made for A and B.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment