A Local Authority v Mother & Ors [2023] EWFC 173 (10 August 2023)
It is not right or necessary to conduct a fact-finding hearing on the disputed allegations of sexual abuse by Father and failure to protect by Mother because such findings would not affect the welfare outcome or care plan for the children, would cause disproportionate delay and cost, and the evidence for the disputed allegations is weak. The threshold for making final care orders is otherwise established.
- Citation
- [2023] EWFC 173
- Parties
- Applicant: A Local Authority; First Respondent: Mother; Second Respondent: Father; Third Respondent: The Children (via their Children's Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings (public Law) / Issues Resolution Hearing; Determination of Whether to Conduct Fact Finding on Disputed Allegations
- Outcome
- Refusal to conduct fact-finding on disputed allegations; final care orders to be made based on revised threshold.
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Fact Finding Hearings, Threshold Criteria, Failure to Protect, Sexual Abuse Allegations, Domestic Abuse, Alcohol Abuse, Welfare of the Child
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority
Applicant
Mother
First Respondent
Father
Second Respondent
The Children (via their Children's Guardian)
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings (public Law) / Issues Resolution Hearing; Determination of Whether to Conduct Fact Finding on Disputed Allegations
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is right and necessary to conduct a fact-finding hearing on allegations of sexual abuse by Father and failure to protect by Mother
- 2 Whether the disputed allegations have a direct bearing on the final care plan and welfare of the children
Ratio Decidendi
It is not right or necessary to conduct a fact-finding hearing on the disputed allegations of sexual abuse by Father and failure to protect by Mother because such findings would not affect the welfare outcome or care plan for the children, would cause disproportionate delay and cost, and the evidence for the disputed allegations is weak. The threshold for making final care orders is otherwise established.
Court Disposition
Refusal to conduct fact-finding on disputed allegations; final care orders to be made based on revised threshold.
Orders
- Allegations in paragraph 5 and paragraphs 7D and E not determined; revised threshold adopted.
- Children to remain with current carers under care orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment