A Local Authority v DG & Ors

A Local Authority v DG & Ors

The court held that compliance with case management directions is mandatory, and the existence of linked criminal proceedings or pending criminal defence statements does not justify delay or non-compliance in care proceedings. Legal practitioners must not advise clients to withhold responses to threshold documents in care proceedings due to criminal proceedings.

Parties
Applicant: A Local Authority; First Respondent (family Proceedings): DG; First Respondent (criminal Proceedings): DG; Second Respondent: IK; Third Respondent (a Child Through the Child’s Guardian): HL
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 January 2014
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Interlocutory Judgment Addressing Compliance and Guidance
Outcome
Interlocutory orders issued; original response to threshold ordered to be filed and served; guidance issued to practitioners.
Legal Topics
Care Proceedings, Concurrent Criminal Proceedings, Case Management Directions, Disclosure, Self Incrimination
Family Law Criminal Law Care Proceedings Concurrent Criminal Proceedings Case Management Directions Disclosure Self Incrimination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A Local Authority

Applicant

DG

First Respondent (family Proceedings)

DG

First Respondent (criminal Proceedings)

IK

Second Respondent

HL

Third Respondent (a Child Through the Child’s Guardian)

Procedural Posture

Care Proceedings / Interlocutory Judgment Addressing Compliance and Guidance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Failure to comply with case management directions
  2. 2 Interplay between care proceedings and linked criminal proceedings
  3. 3 Disclosure and self-incrimination in care proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that compliance with case management directions is mandatory, and the existence of linked criminal proceedings or pending criminal defence statements does not justify delay or non-compliance in care proceedings. Legal practitioners must not advise clients to withhold responses to threshold documents in care proceedings due to criminal proceedings.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders issued; original response to threshold ordered to be filed and served; guidance issued to practitioners.

Orders

  • Original version of father's response to threshold to be filed and served as ordered.
  • Guidance issued regarding compliance with care proceedings orders and interplay with criminal proceedings.