A Local Authority v The Mother & Ors [2023] EWFC 90 (B) (12 June 2023)
Disclosure from the family proceedings will be permitted only to a solicitor, barrister, or other qualified legal adviser for the limited purpose of providing advice and assistance in relation to applications under the Human Rights Act or Equalities Act, with all identifying information about the child, mother, and third parties redacted. All other requests for disclosure to third parties, including public bodies, MPs, researchers, media, and regulatory authorities, are refused due to lack of necessity, risk to the child’s welfare, insufficient clarity, or lack of jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2023] EWFC 90 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant: A Local Authority; First Respondent: The mother; Second Respondent: The father; Third Respondent: A (child, through Children’s Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Family Court Children Act Proceedings / Case Management Disclosure Application at Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for disclosure granted in part and refused in part.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Confidentiality, Welfare of the Child, Transparency in Family Proceedings, Data Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority
Applicant
The mother
First Respondent
The father
Second Respondent
A (child, through Children’s Guardian)
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Court Children Act Proceedings / Case Management Disclosure Application at Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to permit disclosure of documents from family proceedings to various third parties and for various purposes
- 2 Balancing transparency and confidentiality with the welfare of the child
Ratio Decidendi
Disclosure from the family proceedings will be permitted only to a solicitor, barrister, or other qualified legal adviser for the limited purpose of providing advice and assistance in relation to applications under the Human Rights Act or Equalities Act, with all identifying information about the child, mother, and third parties redacted. All other requests for disclosure to third parties, including public bodies, MPs, researchers, media, and regulatory authorities, are refused due to lack of necessity, risk to the child’s welfare, insufficient clarity, or lack of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application for disclosure granted in part and refused in part.
Orders
- Disclosure of documents from the final hearing bundle permitted to a solicitor, barrister, or other qualified legal adviser solely for advice and assistance in relation to applications under the Human Rights Act or Equalities Act, with all identifying information about the child, mother, and third parties redacted.
- All other requests for disclosure to third parties, including the Information Commissioner, local authorities, ombudsman, MPs, researchers, media, and regulatory authorities, are refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment