X and Y (Domestic Abuse: Participation Directions: Obligation to Consider), Re
The court was not obliged to make participation directions or special measures for the mother at the 12 April 2024 hearing because the fact of her being a victim of domestic abuse by the father was not stated at that time, and her legal team did not apply for such directions. The mother was legally represented and actively participated in the hearing. The court found no evidence that her ability to participate was diminished such as to render the hearing unfair. The obligation to consider participation directions arose only after the fact was stated in subsequent correspondence.
- Parties
- Applicant: A Local Authority; First Respondent: A (Mother); Second Respondent: B (Father); Third and Fourth Respondents: X & Y (Children, via their Children’s Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Interim Care Order; Procedural Directions on Participation
- Outcome
- Interim care order granted; application for participation directions refused at this stage
- Legal Topics
- Domestic Abuse, Participation Directions, Vulnerable Parties, Interim Care Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority
Applicant
A (Mother)
First Respondent
B (Father)
Second Respondent
X & Y (Children, via their Children’s Guardian)
Third and Fourth Respondents
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Interim Care Order; Procedural Directions on Participation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court was obliged to make participation directions for the mother as a vulnerable party and/or victim of domestic abuse under FPR 3A
- 2 Whether the process on 12 April 2024 enabled the mother to participate fairly in the proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The court was not obliged to make participation directions or special measures for the mother at the 12 April 2024 hearing because the fact of her being a victim of domestic abuse by the father was not stated at that time, and her legal team did not apply for such directions. The mother was legally represented and actively participated in the hearing. The court found no evidence that her ability to participate was diminished such as to render the hearing unfair. The obligation to consider participation directions arose only after the fact was stated in subsequent correspondence.
Court Disposition
Interim care order granted; application for participation directions refused at this stage
Orders
- Interim care order made for X and Y
- No participation directions or special measures ordered for the mother at this stage
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment