D (A Child) [2010] EWMC 66 (FPC) (2010)

D (A Child) [2010] EWMC 66 (FPC) (2010)

The court found that the threshold criteria for making a care or supervision order under Section 31 or Section 38 of the Children Act 1989 were not satisfied. The evidence did not establish that the child was suffering or likely to suffer significant harm attributable to the care given by the mother. The child was found to be thriving, and concerns raised by the Local Authority were either not substantiated or adequately addressed by the mother.

Citation
[2010] EWMC 66 (FPC)
Parties
Applicant: A Local Authority; 1st Respondent: Ms B; 2nd Respondent: Mr S; 3rd Respondent: Child D through his Guardian
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Interim Care Order Application / First Instance Magistrates’ Court Family Proceedings Court
Outcome
Application for interim care order refused
Legal Topics
Interim Care Order, Threshold Criteria, Children Act 1989, Parental Care, Significant Harm
Family Law Child Protection Interim Care Order Threshold Criteria Children Act 1989 Parental Care Significant Harm

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A Local Authority

Applicant

Ms B

1st Respondent

Mr S

2nd Respondent

Child D through his Guardian

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interim Care Order Application / First Instance Magistrates’ Court Family Proceedings Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether threshold criteria under Section 31(2) Children Act 1989 are met for an interim care order
  2. 2 Whether the child is suffering or likely to suffer significant harm attributable to parental care

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the threshold criteria for making a care or supervision order under Section 31 or Section 38 of the Children Act 1989 were not satisfied. The evidence did not establish that the child was suffering or likely to suffer significant harm attributable to the care given by the mother. The child was found to be thriving, and concerns raised by the Local Authority were either not substantiated or adequately addressed by the mother.

Court Disposition

Application for interim care order refused

Orders

  • No order made under Section 31 or Section 38 of the Children Act 1989