A Local Authority v LD & Anor.

A Local Authority v LD & Anor.

The threshold for s.48(a) MCA 2005 is met if there is a real prospect (at least 25% likelihood) that a capacity assessment will find incapacity, based on evidence with sufficient critical mass. In this case, the evidence provided by the social worker meets that threshold. The inherent jurisdiction cannot be used to deprive a capacitous, non-mentally disordered adult of liberty.

Parties
Applicant: A Local Authority; First Respondent: LD; Second Respondent: RD
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Welfare Application Under Mental Capacity Act 2005 / Inherent Jurisdiction / Interim Application; Determination of Threshold for Interim Orders Under S.48 MCA 2005
Outcome
The court finds the s.48(a) and (b) conditions satisfied; power exists to make the interim order sought, subject to best interests and necessity, which will be determined separately.
Legal Topics
Interim Orders Under S.48 Mental Capacity Act 2005, Inherent Jurisdiction of the High Court, Deprivation of Liberty, Threshold for 'reason to Believe' Incapacity, Best Interests, Safeguarding Vulnerable Adults
Mental Capacity Law Family Law Court of Protection Interim Orders Under S.48 Mental Capacity Act 2005 Inherent Jurisdiction of the High Court Deprivation of Liberty Threshold for 'reason to Believe' Incapacity Best Interests +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A Local Authority

Applicant

LD

First Respondent

RD

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Welfare Application Under Mental Capacity Act 2005 / Inherent Jurisdiction / Interim Application; Determination of Threshold for Interim Orders Under S.48 MCA 2005

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the meaning and scope of the s.48(a) condition ('reason to believe' P lacks capacity)?
  2. 2 If s.48 does not apply, does the inherent jurisdiction permit deprivation of liberty for a capacitous but vulnerable adult?

Ratio Decidendi

The threshold for s.48(a) MCA 2005 is met if there is a real prospect (at least 25% likelihood) that a capacity assessment will find incapacity, based on evidence with sufficient critical mass. In this case, the evidence provided by the social worker meets that threshold. The inherent jurisdiction cannot be used to deprive a capacitous, non-mentally disordered adult of liberty.

Court Disposition

The court finds the s.48(a) and (b) conditions satisfied; power exists to make the interim order sought, subject to best interests and necessity, which will be determined separately.