A Local Authority v AA & Ors.
On the balance of probabilities, the Local Authority did not prove that Y’s injuries were caused by abusive head trauma (shaking) by the Father. The evidence as a whole, including lack of other physical signs, absence of risk factors, credible parental evidence, and academic literature supporting the possibility of injury from short falls, outweighed the medical opinion favouring shaking as the cause.
- Parties
- Applicant: A Local Authority; First Respondent: AA; Second Respondent: BB; Third Respondent: Y (through her Children’s Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Judgment After Fact Finding Hearing
- Outcome
- Threshold not proved; allegations not established.
- Legal Topics
- Non Accidental Injury, Abusive Head Trauma, Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof, Standard of Proof, Causation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority
Applicant
AA
First Respondent
BB
Second Respondent
Y (through her Children’s Guardian)
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Judgment After Fact Finding Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Y's injuries were caused by abusive head trauma (shaking) or accidental fall
- 2 Assessment of medical evidence and academic literature
- 3 Credibility of parental evidence
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, the Local Authority did not prove that Y’s injuries were caused by abusive head trauma (shaking) by the Father. The evidence as a whole, including lack of other physical signs, absence of risk factors, credible parental evidence, and academic literature supporting the possibility of injury from short falls, outweighed the medical opinion favouring shaking as the cause.
Court Disposition
Threshold not proved; allegations not established.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment