A Local Authority v SB & Ors
An order discharging parental responsibility under section 4(2A) Children Act 1989 is a welfare-based decision, not an automatic consequence of a declaration of non-parentage. The court must consider the child's welfare as paramount, applying the welfare checklist and the no order principle. In this case, the court found that it was in N's best interests for Mr K's parental responsibility to be discharged, given the lack of a biological link, the peripheral nature of Mr K's role in N's life, and the risks associated with his lifestyle.
- Parties
- Applicant: A Local Authority; First Respondent: SB; Second Respondent: FM; Third Respondent: RK; Fourth and Fifth Respondents: The Children (via their Children’s Guardian); Fifth and Sixth Respondents: DB and DB
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Children / Judgment on Application to Discharge Parental Responsibility
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Parental Responsibility, Discharge of Parental Responsibility, Children Act 1989, Welfare Principle, Non Parentage Declaration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority
Applicant
SB
First Respondent
FM
Second Respondent
RK
Third Respondent
The Children (via their Children’s Guardian)
Fourth and Fifth Respondents
DB and DB
Fifth and Sixth Respondents
Procedural Posture
Family Law Children / Judgment on Application to Discharge Parental Responsibility
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether parental responsibility acquired by a man named as father on the birth certificate but later found not to be the biological father should be discharged under section 4(2A) Children Act 1989
- 2 Whether the discharge of parental responsibility is a welfare-based decision or automatic upon declaration of non-parentage
Ratio Decidendi
An order discharging parental responsibility under section 4(2A) Children Act 1989 is a welfare-based decision, not an automatic consequence of a declaration of non-parentage. The court must consider the child's welfare as paramount, applying the welfare checklist and the no order principle. In this case, the court found that it was in N's best interests for Mr K's parental responsibility to be discharged, given the lack of a biological link, the peripheral nature of Mr K's role in N's life, and the risks associated with his lifestyle.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Mr K's parental responsibility for N is discharged with effect from the date of judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment