R, S and T (Children), Re [2019] EWFC B86 (16 May 2019)
The court found R's accounts credible, noting his inability to fabricate such matters, the lack of contradictory evidence from the mother, and non-engagement by the father and Z. The context of previous findings of familial sexual abuse and lack of sexual boundaries supported the plausibility of the additional allegations. The court found the additional allegations proved on the balance of probability.
- Citation
- [2019] EWFC B86
- Parties
- Applicant: A Local Authority; First Respondent: The Mother; Second to Fourth Respondents: R, S and T (Children acting through their children’s guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Child Protection / Addendum Fact Finding Judgment
- Outcome
- Additional allegations proved on the balance of probability.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Abuse, Fact Finding, Care Proceedings, Anonymity Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority
Applicant
The Mother
First Respondent
R, S and T (Children acting through their children’s guardian)
Second to Fourth Respondents
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Protection / Addendum Fact Finding Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether additional allegations of sexual abuse and presence of other family members during abuse are proved on the balance of probability
Ratio Decidendi
The court found R's accounts credible, noting his inability to fabricate such matters, the lack of contradictory evidence from the mother, and non-engagement by the father and Z. The context of previous findings of familial sexual abuse and lack of sexual boundaries supported the plausibility of the additional allegations. The court found the additional allegations proved on the balance of probability.
Court Disposition
Additional allegations proved on the balance of probability.
Orders
- Anonymity of the children and family members must be strictly preserved in any published version of the judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment