A LA v X & Y and Others (No 5: Transparency order)
The court found that the existing Transparency Order sufficiently protects against jigsaw identification and that the further amendments sought by the parents are neither necessary, proportionate, nor justified. The risk of identification is too remote given the extensive prohibitions already in place. The application was refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: A Local Authority; First Respondent: X; Second Respondent: Y; Third Respondent: B; Fourth Respondent: C; Intervenor: A
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Application to Amend Transparency Order
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Transparency Order, Anonymisation, Reporting Restrictions, Care Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority
Applicant
X
First Respondent
Y
Second Respondent
B
Third Respondent
C
Fourth Respondent
A
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Application to Amend Transparency Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether further amendments to the Transparency Order are necessary to prevent jigsaw identification of the children
- 2 Whether prohibitions sought by parents are proportionate and justified
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the existing Transparency Order sufficiently protects against jigsaw identification and that the further amendments sought by the parents are neither necessary, proportionate, nor justified. The risk of identification is too remote given the extensive prohibitions already in place. The application was refused.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- No further amendments to the Transparency Order
- Transparency Order to be amended to specifically prohibit identification of Y's regulatory body
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment