SF, Re
SF retains capacity to consent to sexual relations and to decide contact with her husband, based on expert evidence distinguishing her semantic memory and pre-morbid passivity from her dementia-related impairment. Deprivation of liberty at home and in respite care is attributable to State arrangements and must be authorised.
- Parties
- Applicant: A Local Authority in Yorkshire; Respondent: SF
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations made that SF has capacity to consent to sexual relations and to decide contact with her husband; deprivation of liberty authorised.
- Legal Topics
- Capacity to Consent to Sexual Relations, Capacity to Decide Contact With Spouse, Deprivation of Liberty, Best Interests Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority in Yorkshire
Applicant
SF
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether SF has capacity to consent to sexual relations
- 2 Whether SF has capacity to decide contact with her husband
- 3 Whether SF is deprived of her liberty and if so, whether such deprivation is lawful
Ratio Decidendi
SF retains capacity to consent to sexual relations and to decide contact with her husband, based on expert evidence distinguishing her semantic memory and pre-morbid passivity from her dementia-related impairment. Deprivation of liberty at home and in respite care is attributable to State arrangements and must be authorised.
Court Disposition
Declarations made that SF has capacity to consent to sexual relations and to decide contact with her husband; deprivation of liberty authorised.
Orders
- Declaration that SF has capacity in relation to sexual relations and contact with her husband.
- Authorisation of deprivation of liberty at Hawthorns and at home.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment