B (Children)
The process before the Family Court judge failed to properly engage with central evidence regarding the child's welfare, particularly the grandmother's understanding of past abuse. The judge made up his mind too early and announced his conclusion prematurely, resulting in an inadequate and unfair process. The appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted for rehearing.
- Parties
- Appellant: A Local Authority; Respondent: B (Children); Interested Party: Paternal Grandmother; Interested Party: Mother; Interested Party: Father
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Care Proceedings, Child Arrangement Orders, Supervision Orders, Adoption, Fair Hearing, Judicial Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority
Appellant
B (Children)
Respondent
Paternal Grandmother
Interested Party
Mother
Interested Party
Father
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the hearing before the Family Court judge was conducted fairly
- 2 Whether the judge made a proper evaluation of the child's welfare
- 3 Adequacy of assessments of the paternal grandmother
Ratio Decidendi
The process before the Family Court judge failed to properly engage with central evidence regarding the child's welfare, particularly the grandmother's understanding of past abuse. The judge made up his mind too early and announced his conclusion prematurely, resulting in an inadequate and unfair process. The appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted for rehearing.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Judge's determination set aside
- Welfare issue remitted for rehearing at first instance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment