A Local Authority v DZ & Ors

A Local Authority v DZ & Ors

The Court has jurisdiction under Article 11 of the 1996 Hague Convention to make urgent protective orders, including a return order, for AZ, who is habitually resident in China but present in England. The child's welfare requires his return to China, and the interim care order and deprivation of liberty order are justified until return is effected.

Parties
Applicant: A Local Authority; Respondent: DZ; Respondent: WZ; Respondent: A Child via their Children's Guardian; Respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 January 2022
Procedural Posture
Public Law and Inherent Jurisdiction (family Law Act 1986, 1996 Hague Convention) / Final Judgment on Jurisdiction and Welfare Orders
Outcome
Return order granted; interim care order and deprivation of liberty order to continue until return; practical directions for implementation.
Legal Topics
Habitual Residence, Return Orders, Deprivation of Liberty, Interim Care Orders, Jurisdictional Pathways, Children's Welfare
Family Law International Child Protection Jurisdiction Habitual Residence Return Orders Deprivation of Liberty Interim Care Orders Jurisdictional Pathways +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A Local Authority

Applicant

DZ

Respondent

WZ

Respondent

A Child via their Children's Guardian

Respondent

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Public Law and Inherent Jurisdiction (family Law Act 1986, 1996 Hague Convention) / Final Judgment on Jurisdiction and Welfare Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Jurisdiction to make orders for a child habitually resident in China but present in England
  2. 2 Appropriate legal pathway for return order (1996 Hague Convention vs Family Law Act 1986)
  3. 3 Welfare of the child and implementation of return to China

Ratio Decidendi

The Court has jurisdiction under Article 11 of the 1996 Hague Convention to make urgent protective orders, including a return order, for AZ, who is habitually resident in China but present in England. The child's welfare requires his return to China, and the interim care order and deprivation of liberty order are justified until return is effected.

Court Disposition

Return order granted; interim care order and deprivation of liberty order to continue until return; practical directions for implementation.

Orders

  • AZ to be returned to China as soon as practicable.
  • Interim care order and deprivation of liberty order to continue until return.