L & Ors (Children : care proceedings)
There is no realistic prospect of positive viability assessments for the proposed family members, no substantive challenge has been presented, and further assessments would imperil the timetable to the detriment of the children's welfare; therefore, further assessments are refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: A Local Authority; Respondent: K; Respondent: J; Children: L, M, N, O (by their Children's Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Interlocutory Judgment on Viability Assessments
- Outcome
- Application for further viability assessments refused.
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Viability Assessments, Delay in Proceedings, Alternate Carers, Adoption
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Local Authority
Applicant
K
Respondent
J
Respondent
L, M, N, O (by their Children's Guardian)
Children
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Interlocutory Judgment on Viability Assessments
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether further viability assessments of family members should be undertaken
- 2 Whether late challenges to negative viability assessments should be allowed
- 3 Impact of delay on welfare of children
Ratio Decidendi
There is no realistic prospect of positive viability assessments for the proposed family members, no substantive challenge has been presented, and further assessments would imperil the timetable to the detriment of the children's welfare; therefore, further assessments are refused.
Court Disposition
Application for further viability assessments refused.
Orders
- Local authority may proceed on the basis of negative viability assessments.
- No further assessment of the paternal grandfather or other family members.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment