RD (anorexia : compulsory treatment)
Given the express wishes of RD and the intensely personal nature of the health matters discussed, the hearing is to be held in private.
- Parties
- Applicant: A Midlands NHS Trust; 1st Respondent: RD (via her Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor); 2nd Respondent: SD; 3rd Respondent: LD; 4th Respondent: A Midlands Clinical Commissioning Group
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Application / Application for Hearing to Be Held in Private
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Privacy of Proceedings, Health and Welfare, Court of Protection Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
A Midlands NHS Trust
Applicant
RD (via her Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor)
1st Respondent
SD
2nd Respondent
LD
3rd Respondent
A Midlands Clinical Commissioning Group
4th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Application / Application for Hearing to Be Held in Private
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the hearing should be held in private due to the personal nature of the matters discussed
Ratio Decidendi
Given the express wishes of RD and the intensely personal nature of the health matters discussed, the hearing is to be held in private.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- The hearing is to take place in private.
- No member of the public is to be admitted to the hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment