K, Re (Revocation or Adoption: A Declaratory Judgment) [2023] EWFC 267 (B) (29 September 2023)
K was not lawfully placed for adoption with F and C because the mandatory procedural requirements under the Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005, including panel approval and matching, were not complied with. Therefore, the statutory bar in s.24(2)(b) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 does not apply, and M's application for leave to revoke the placement order may proceed. The Local Authority cannot circumvent statutory requirements by delegating responsibilities to a third party or by relying on F and C's status as foster carers.
- Citation
- [2023] EWFC 267 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant: A Mother; First Respondent: A Father; Second Respondent: A Local Authority; Third Respondent: A Child (Through her Children’s Guardian); Interested Parties: F and C
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Children (adoption/placement) / Declaratory Judgment on Status of Placement and Procedural Eligibility for Applications
- Outcome
- Declaratory judgment: K has not been lawfully placed for adoption with F and C; M's application for leave to revoke the placement order may proceed; F and C's adoption application is not procedurally barred but must be considered in light of K's status.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption, Placement Orders, Revocation of Placement Orders, Procedural Requirements for Adoption, Leave to Apply, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Mother
Applicant
A Father
First Respondent
A Local Authority
Second Respondent
A Child (Through her Children’s Guardian)
Third Respondent
F and C
Interested Parties
Procedural Posture
Family Law Children (adoption/placement) / Declaratory Judgment on Status of Placement and Procedural Eligibility for Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the child K was lawfully 'placed for adoption' with F and C under the Adoption and Children Act 2002 and associated Regulations
- 2 Whether the mother (M) is procedurally barred from applying to revoke the placement order under s.24(2)(b) of the Act
- 3 Whether F and C's application for adoption is procedurally valid absent a formal placement
Ratio Decidendi
K was not lawfully placed for adoption with F and C because the mandatory procedural requirements under the Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005, including panel approval and matching, were not complied with. Therefore, the statutory bar in s.24(2)(b) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 does not apply, and M's application for leave to revoke the placement order may proceed. The Local Authority cannot circumvent statutory requirements by delegating responsibilities to a third party or by relying on F and C's status as foster carers.
Court Disposition
Declaratory judgment: K has not been lawfully placed for adoption with F and C; M's application for leave to revoke the placement order may proceed; F and C's adoption application is not procedurally barred but must be considered in light of K's status.
Orders
- Declaration that K has not been placed for adoption with F and C within the meaning of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 and the Adoption Agencies Regulations 2005.
- Permission for M to pursue her application for leave to revoke the placement order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment