A NHS Foundation Trust v Ms X (By Her Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor)
It is not in Ms X's best interests to be subject to further compulsory detention and treatment for anorexia nervosa, nor to compel nutrition and hydration, given her lack of capacity regarding anorexia treatment, her consistent refusal, the medical evidence of futility and harm, and the legal requirement to respect her autonomy and advance decision.
- Parties
- Applicant: A NHS Foundation Trust; Respondent: Ms X
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Relief granted as sought by the applicant Trust.
- Legal Topics
- Mental Capacity, Best Interests, Compulsory Treatment, Advance Decision, Anorexia Nervosa, Alcohol Dependence, Right to Life, Personal Autonomy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A NHS Foundation Trust
Applicant
Ms X
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is in Ms X's best interests to be subject to further compulsory detention and treatment for anorexia nervosa
- 2 Whether it is lawful for clinicians not to provide nutrition and hydration with which Ms X does not comply
- 3 Whether Ms X lacks capacity to make decisions regarding treatment for anorexia nervosa
Ratio Decidendi
It is not in Ms X's best interests to be subject to further compulsory detention and treatment for anorexia nervosa, nor to compel nutrition and hydration, given her lack of capacity regarding anorexia treatment, her consistent refusal, the medical evidence of futility and harm, and the legal requirement to respect her autonomy and advance decision.
Court Disposition
Relief granted as sought by the applicant Trust.
Orders
- Declaration that it is not in Ms X's best interests to be subject to further compulsory detention and treatment for anorexia nervosa, whether under the Mental Health Act 1983 or otherwise.
- Declaration that it is lawful for clinicians not to provide Ms X with nutrition and hydration with which she does not comply.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment