St.Maximus Shipping Co.Ltd. v A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S
The Letter of Undertaking obliges Maersk to pay the sum ascertained to be due in the Adjustment prepared by the Average Adjusters; Maersk is bound by the Adjustment and the determinations therein, including the Adjusters’ fees and sums due under the Non-Separation Agreement. There is no estoppel by representation, and no basis for rectification for common mistake.
- Parties
- Claimant: St. Maximus Shipping Co. Ltd; Defendant: A. P. Moller-Maersk A/S
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Dispute / Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Preliminary issues determined in favour of the Claimant on construction and binding effect of the Adjustment; no estoppel or rectification.
- Legal Topics
- General Average, Letters of Undertaking, Contract Construction, Estoppel, Rectification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
St. Maximus Shipping Co. Ltd
Claimant
A. P. Moller-Maersk A/S
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Dispute / Trial of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is bound, on a proper construction of the Letter of Undertaking, to pay the proportion of any general average and/or special charges as ascertained in the Adjustment
- 2 Whether the claimant is estopped by representation from asserting the defendant is so bound
- 3 Whether the Letter of Undertaking should be rectified for common mistake
Ratio Decidendi
The Letter of Undertaking obliges Maersk to pay the sum ascertained to be due in the Adjustment prepared by the Average Adjusters; Maersk is bound by the Adjustment and the determinations therein, including the Adjusters’ fees and sums due under the Non-Separation Agreement. There is no estoppel by representation, and no basis for rectification for common mistake.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issues determined in favour of the Claimant on construction and binding effect of the Adjustment; no estoppel or rectification.
Orders
- Maersk is obliged to pay the sum ascertained to be due in the Adjustment.
- Maersk is bound by the Adjusters’ determinations, including their fees and sums due under the Non-Separation Agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment