A & P Trading Solutions Limited v The Pensions Regulator
The Appellant provided a consistent and credible explanation that the notices were not received due to address confusion and delivery to an unoccupied flat, rebutting the presumption of service. Therefore, the Appellant had a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the UCN, and the penalty notices should not...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: A & P Trading Solutions Limited; Respondent: The Pensions Regulator
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Automatic Enrolment, Employer Duties, Penalty Notices, Service of Notices, Reasonable Excuse
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A & P Trading Solutions Limited
Appellant
The Pensions Regulator
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the appeal given the timing of the review request
- 2 Whether the Appellant had a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the unpaid contributions notice (UCN)
- 3 Whether the fixed penalty and escalating penalty notices were properly issued
Ratio Decidendi
The Appellant provided a consistent and credible explanation that the notices were not received due to address confusion and delivery to an unoccupied flat, rebutting the presumption of service. Therefore, the Appellant had a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with the UCN, and the penalty notices should not have been issued.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Fixed penalty notice and escalating penalty notice set aside
- Matter remitted to the Regulator with directions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment