R v A.R.B.

There are no arguable grounds that the conviction is unsafe or that the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive; therefore, leave to appeal is refused.

Parties: Applicant: A. R. B; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 11 September 2024
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome: leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused; extension of time to apply for leave to appeal against sentence granted
Legal Topics: Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence, Drug Offences, Conspiracy to Supply Controlled Drugs

Criminal Law Appeal Against Conviction Appeal Against Sentence Drug Offences Conspiracy to Supply Controlled Drugs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4

Parties

A. R. B

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

1 Whether there are arguable grounds that the conviction is unsafe
2 Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

There are no arguable grounds that the conviction is unsafe or that the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive; therefore, leave to appeal is refused.

Court Disposition

leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused; extension of time to apply for leave to appeal against sentence granted

Orders

No publication of the name of the applicant or any matter that could identify him or his family pursuant to section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981
Extension of time to apply for leave to appeal against sentence granted