A Taylor Surfacing v The Pensions Regulator

A Taylor Surfacing v The Pensions Regulator

The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with tribunal directions to provide the required form and failed to co-operate, meeting the criteria under Rule 8(3).

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: A Taylor Surfacing; Respondent: The Pensions Regulator
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 March 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Case Management Order; Appeal Struck Out
Outcome
appeal struck out
Legal Topics
Right of Appeal, Case Management, Strike Out, Non Compliance With Tribunal Directions
Pensions Regulatory Law Right of Appeal Case Management Strike Out Non Compliance With Tribunal Directions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A Taylor Surfacing

Appellant

The Pensions Regulator

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Case Management Order; Appeal Struck Out

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant complied with tribunal directions
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be struck out for non-compliance

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with tribunal directions to provide the required form and failed to co-operate, meeting the criteria under Rule 8(3).

Court Disposition

appeal struck out

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out.