A v B

A v B

The distributable assets are those identified in the asset schedule, with no add-back for alleged depletion or legal costs. Both parties have broadly equal needs and contributions. The Husband’s company is valued at net bank balance after tax. Both properties in Country Y are matrimonial assets. Lump sum, pension sharing, and equal sharing of school fees achieve fairness and meet needs.

Parties
Applicant: A; Respondent: B
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 December 2025
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedy Application (divorce) / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application granted in part; financial remedy orders made.
Legal Topics
Financial Remedies, Asset Division, Pension Sharing, Child Maintenance, Clean Break, Add Back Jurisprudence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 14
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A

Applicant

B

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Financial Remedy Application (divorce) / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether properties in Country Y are matrimonial assets
  2. 2 Valuation of Husband’s company
  3. 3 Add-back for depletion/non-disclosure of capital

Ratio Decidendi

The distributable assets are those identified in the asset schedule, with no add-back for alleged depletion or legal costs. Both parties have broadly equal needs and contributions. The Husband’s company is valued at net bank balance after tax. Both properties in Country Y are matrimonial assets. Lump sum, pension sharing, and equal sharing of school fees achieve fairness and meet needs.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part; financial remedy orders made.

Orders

  • Husband to pay lump sum of £275,000 to Wife
  • Pension sharing order: 55.43% of Wife’s Country X pension fund to Husband