C (A Child), Re
All statutory criteria under s.54 HFEA 2008 were satisfied, the payments made were not disproportionate or contrary to public policy, and the lifelong welfare of the child required the making of a parental order.
- Parties
- Applicant: A; Applicant: B; Respondent: D; Respondent: E
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Parental Order Application (surrogacy) / Judgment
- Outcome
- Parental order granted.
- Legal Topics
- Surrogacy, Parental Orders, Child Welfare, Consent, Payments in Surrogacy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
A
Applicant
B
Applicant
D
Respondent
E
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Parental Order Application (surrogacy) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory criteria under s.54 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 are satisfied for making a parental order
- 2 Whether payments made to the surrogate and agency should be authorised under s.54(8)
- 3 Whether making the parental order is in the lifelong welfare interests of the child
Ratio Decidendi
All statutory criteria under s.54 HFEA 2008 were satisfied, the payments made were not disproportionate or contrary to public policy, and the lifelong welfare of the child required the making of a parental order.
Court Disposition
Parental order granted.
Orders
- Parental order made in favour of A and B securing their legal parentage of C.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment