AA (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer - Addis Ababa

AA (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer - Addis Ababa

Paragraph 352D must be read together with the general interpretation provisions in paragraph 6, which incorporates the requirements of paragraph 309A for de facto adoption. Only children adopted in accordance with paragraph 309A qualify under paragraph 352D. There is no separate or broader category for children under Kafala or other informal arrangements. The 2007 letter does not constitute a binding policy outside the Immigration Rules.

Parties
Appellant: AA (Somalia); Respondent: Entry Clearance Officer (Addis Ababa)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 May 2012
Procedural Posture
Immigration and Asylum Appeal / Appeal From Upper Tribunal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Immigration Rules, De Facto Adoption, Family Reunion for Refugees, Kafala Under Islamic Law, Article 8 ECHR

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AA (Somalia)

Appellant

Entry Clearance Officer (Addis Ababa)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Immigration and Asylum Appeal / Appeal From Upper Tribunal to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether paragraph 352D of the Immigration Rules allows entry clearance for a child under Kafala or only for children adopted in accordance with paragraph 309A
  2. 2 Whether a policy outside the Immigration Rules precluded refusal of entry clearance

Ratio Decidendi

Paragraph 352D must be read together with the general interpretation provisions in paragraph 6, which incorporates the requirements of paragraph 309A for de facto adoption. Only children adopted in accordance with paragraph 309A qualify under paragraph 352D. There is no separate or broader category for children under Kafala or other informal arrangements. The 2007 letter does not constitute a binding policy outside the Immigration Rules.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed