AA v Disclosure and Barring Service
The DBS made material errors of law by failing to address relevant evidence and explain its evaluation of witness reliability, rendering the barring decision unsustainable.
- Parties
- Appellant: AA; Respondent: Disclosure and Barring Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment After Oral Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; matter remitted to DBS for a new decision.
- Legal Topics
- Mistake of Fact, Mistake of Law, Children's Barred List, Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act, Procedural Fairness, Evidentiary Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Parties
AA
Appellant
Disclosure and Barring Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment After Oral Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the DBS made material mistakes of law or fact in placing the Appellant on the Children’s Barred List
- 2 Whether the DBS properly evaluated the reliability of witness evidence
- 3 Whether procedural errors affected the barring decision
Ratio Decidendi
The DBS made material errors of law by failing to address relevant evidence and explain its evaluation of witness reliability, rendering the barring decision unsustainable.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; matter remitted to DBS for a new decision.
Orders
- DBS to make a fresh decision regarding the Appellant’s inclusion on the Children’s Barred List.
- Appellant’s name shall not be removed from the Children’s Barred List pending the new decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment