AA & SA, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2805 (29 November 2010)
The Court found that the judge correctly applied the principles regarding adjournment and abuse of process, that both AA and SA had knowledge of and breached the Restraint Orders by orchestrating the asset transfers, and that the sentences of 18 months were justified given the scale and deliberate nature of the contempt.
- Citation
- [2010] EWCA Crim 2805
- Parties
- Respondent: R; Appellant: AA; Appellant: SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (contempt of Court) / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeals against conviction and sentence dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Restraint Order, Committal for Contempt, Adjournment of Proceedings, Abuse of Process, Sentencing for Contempt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Respondent
AA
Appellant
SA
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (contempt of Court) / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contempt proceedings should have been stayed or adjourned pending criminal trial
- 2 Whether there was abuse of process due to delay or prejudice
- 3 Whether AA and SA had knowledge of and breached the Restraint Orders
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the judge correctly applied the principles regarding adjournment and abuse of process, that both AA and SA had knowledge of and breached the Restraint Orders by orchestrating the asset transfers, and that the sentences of 18 months were justified given the scale and deliberate nature of the contempt.
Court Disposition
Appeals against conviction and sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment