Davies, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 871 (07 April 2011)

Davies, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 871 (07 April 2011)

The conviction was unsafe because the appellant suffered unfair prejudice at trial due to procedural irregularities, specifically the conduct of the inquest, which allowed the prosecution to undermine the credibility of a key defence witness, and because the identification evidence was weak and flawed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] EWCA Crim 871
Parties
Respondent: R; Appellant: Aaron Lee Davies
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Legal Topics
Manslaughter, Identification Evidence, Abuse of Process, Fair Trial, Retrial
Criminal Law Manslaughter Identification Evidence Abuse of Process Fair Trial Retrial

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Respondent

Aaron Lee Davies

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction was unsafe due to flawed identification evidence and procedural irregularities
  2. 2 Whether the appellant received a fair trial given the conduct of the inquest and prosecution
  3. 3 Whether the trial should have been stayed for abuse of process

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was unsafe because the appellant suffered unfair prejudice at trial due to procedural irregularities, specifically the conduct of the inquest, which allowed the prosecution to undermine the credibility of a key defence witness, and because the identification evidence was weak and flawed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed

Orders

  • Conviction quashed
  • Written submissions on retrial to be exchanged within 7 days if the Crown seeks a retrial