Scott, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 712 (10 May 2023)
The discretionary period of driving disqualification imposed was manifestly excessive and failed to consider the impact on rehabilitation; the appropriate period is six years (four years discretionary plus two years uplift). The overall sentence of four years' imprisonment stands as intended by the sentencing judge.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 712
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Aaron Scott
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Dangerous Driving, Possession of Offensive Weapon, Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, Driving Without Insurance, Sentencing, Disqualification From Driving
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Aaron Scott
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period of driving disqualification imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the overall sentence was properly pronounced and recorded
Ratio Decidendi
The discretionary period of driving disqualification imposed was manifestly excessive and failed to consider the impact on rehabilitation; the appropriate period is six years (four years discretionary plus two years uplift). The overall sentence of four years' imprisonment stands as intended by the sentencing judge.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Quash the original disqualification order
- Substitute a disqualification from driving for six years (four years discretionary plus two years uplift) and until an extended test is passed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment