AB v XX & Anor (Special Guardianship Orders) [2023] EWFC 287 (08 October 2023)
It is unnecessary and disproportionate to grant a Special Guardianship Order for the purpose of routine childcare arrangements, and using the order to support an immigration application is an abuse of jurisdiction. Leave to apply is refused.
- Citation
- [2023] EWFC 287
- Parties
- Applicant: AB; First Respondent: XX; Second Respondent: ZZ
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Special Guardianship Order / Leave to Apply for Special Guardianship Order
- Outcome
- Leave to apply for Special Guardianship Order refused
- Legal Topics
- Special Guardianship Order, Children Act 1989, Abuse of Process, Immigration and Family Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB
Applicant
XX
First Respondent
ZZ
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Special Guardianship Order / Leave to Apply for Special Guardianship Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted for an application for a Special Guardianship Order by a maternal uncle
- 2 Whether the application constitutes an abuse of the Special Guardianship Order jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
It is unnecessary and disproportionate to grant a Special Guardianship Order for the purpose of routine childcare arrangements, and using the order to support an immigration application is an abuse of jurisdiction. Leave to apply is refused.
Court Disposition
Leave to apply for Special Guardianship Order refused
Orders
- Application for leave to apply for Special Guardianship Order is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment