AB (Court of Protection: Police Disclosure)
The psychological reports are not relevant to the police investigation as they do not address AB’s capacity to access the internet and social media during the period of the alleged offences (2017 and 2018). The importance of confidentiality and frankness in Court of Protection proceedings outweighs the public interest in disclosure in this case.
- Parties
- Applicant: AB; Respondent: A Police Force; Respondent: WLCCG
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Protection Application / Judgment on Police Application for Disclosure of Psychological Reports
- Outcome
- Application for disclosure refused
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Court Documents, Capacity Assessment, Police Investigation, Confidentiality in Court of Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB
Applicant
A Police Force
Respondent
WLCCG
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Application / Judgment on Police Application for Disclosure of Psychological Reports
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether psychological reports relating to AB should be disclosed to the police for use in a criminal investigation
- 2 Whether the reports are relevant to the police investigation into alleged offences committed by AB in 2017 and 2018
Ratio Decidendi
The psychological reports are not relevant to the police investigation as they do not address AB’s capacity to access the internet and social media during the period of the alleged offences (2017 and 2018). The importance of confidentiality and frankness in Court of Protection proceedings outweighs the public interest in disclosure in this case.
Court Disposition
Application for disclosure refused
Orders
- No disclosure of the psychological reports to the police
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment