AB v AC

AB v AC

The court found that, after setting aside £6m for tax liabilities, the remaining liquidity and anticipated receipts from X company M-Fund should be divided equally, as the uncertainties and mingling of assets over a long marriage outweighed the husband's premarital contributions. Illiquid future receipts from X company N-Fund and Fund P are to be split 75/25 in the husband's favour. The wife's needs are met at £6.3m, but her claim is not capped. The husband's conduct regarding tax and charitable spending does not warrant penalisation in the division.

Parties
Applicant: AB; Respondent: AC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Divorce Financial Remedies / Final Hearing
Outcome
Assets divided as per judgment; equal division of liquid assets and M-Fund receipts, 75/25 split of illiquid future receipts in husband's favour.
Legal Topics
Financial Remedies, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Tax Liabilities, Premarital Contributions, Needs Assessment, Sharing Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AB

Applicant

AC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Financial Remedies / Final Hearing

  1. 1 How should the parties' assets be divided given premarital contributions and significant tax liabilities?
  2. 2 Should the wife's claim be capped by her needs or should she share in future receipts from X company?
  3. 3 What impact should the husband's conduct regarding tax affairs and charitable spending have on the division?

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, after setting aside £6m for tax liabilities, the remaining liquidity and anticipated receipts from X company M-Fund should be divided equally, as the uncertainties and mingling of assets over a long marriage outweighed the husband's premarital contributions. Illiquid future receipts from X company N-Fund and Fund P are to be split 75/25 in the husband's favour. The wife's needs are met at £6.3m, but her claim is not capped. The husband's conduct regarding tax and charitable spending does not warrant penalisation in the division.

Court Disposition

Assets divided as per judgment; equal division of liquid assets and M-Fund receipts, 75/25 split of illiquid future receipts in husband's favour.

Orders

  • £6,000,000 set aside for tax liabilities from liquid funds.
  • Remaining liquidity (£8,976,500) divided equally.