AB v AC
The court found that, after setting aside £6m for tax liabilities, the remaining liquidity and anticipated receipts from X company M-Fund should be divided equally, as the uncertainties and mingling of assets over a long marriage outweighed the husband's premarital contributions. Illiquid future receipts from X company N-Fund and Fund P are to be split 75/25 in the husband's favour. The wife's needs are met at £6.3m, but her claim is not capped. The husband's conduct regarding tax and charitable spending does not warrant penalisation in the division.
- Parties
- Applicant: AB; Respondent: AC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Financial Remedies / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Assets divided as per judgment; equal division of liquid assets and M-Fund receipts, 75/25 split of illiquid future receipts in husband's favour.
- Legal Topics
- Financial Remedies, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Tax Liabilities, Premarital Contributions, Needs Assessment, Sharing Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB
Applicant
AC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Financial Remedies / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 How should the parties' assets be divided given premarital contributions and significant tax liabilities?
- 2 Should the wife's claim be capped by her needs or should she share in future receipts from X company?
- 3 What impact should the husband's conduct regarding tax affairs and charitable spending have on the division?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, after setting aside £6m for tax liabilities, the remaining liquidity and anticipated receipts from X company M-Fund should be divided equally, as the uncertainties and mingling of assets over a long marriage outweighed the husband's premarital contributions. Illiquid future receipts from X company N-Fund and Fund P are to be split 75/25 in the husband's favour. The wife's needs are met at £6.3m, but her claim is not capped. The husband's conduct regarding tax and charitable spending does not warrant penalisation in the division.
Court Disposition
Assets divided as per judgment; equal division of liquid assets and M-Fund receipts, 75/25 split of illiquid future receipts in husband's favour.
Orders
- £6,000,000 set aside for tax liabilities from liquid funds.
- Remaining liquidity (£8,976,500) divided equally.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment