Abbey National Plc v Customs and Excise
The statutory and regulatory provisions requiring apportionment on a time or straight-line basis for VAT bad debt relief are lawful, rational, and override any contractual or accounting arrangements. There is no requirement in domestic or Community law to use the rule of 78 or actuarial method, and the straight-line method is a permissible and rational approach. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Abbey National plc; Respondents: The Commissioners of Customs and Excise
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / High Court Appeal From VAT and Duties Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax, Bad Debt Relief, Apportionment of Payments, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abbey National plc
Appellant
The Commissioners of Customs and Excise
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / High Court Appeal From VAT and Duties Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the straight-line method of apportionment for VAT bad debt relief is lawful and rational under UK and Community law
- 2 Whether contractual arrangements between finance company and customer override statutory apportionment rules
- 3 Whether the rule of 78 or actuarial method should be used for apportionment instead of the straight-line method
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory and regulatory provisions requiring apportionment on a time or straight-line basis for VAT bad debt relief are lawful, rational, and override any contractual or accounting arrangements. There is no requirement in domestic or Community law to use the rule of 78 or actuarial method, and the straight-line method is a permissible and rational approach. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by Abbey National plc is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment