Fujifilm Kyowa Biologics Co Ltd v Abbvie Biotechnology Ltd (Rev 1) [2016] EWHC 425 (Pat) (01 March 2016)
The UK Patents Court has jurisdiction to grant a declaration that the claimant's biosimilar product would have been obvious or anticipated at the priority date of the relevant AbbVie patents and divisionals, as such relief is not barred by section 74 of the Patents Act 1977 and serves a useful commercial purpose in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 425 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant: FUJIFILM KYOWA BIOLOGICS CO., LTD.; Defendant: ABBVIE BIOTECHNOLOGY LIMITED
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Litigation / Interlocutory Applications (application to Amend Claim and Strike Out)
- Outcome
- Application to strike out dismissed; application to amend claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Declaratory Relief, Patent Validity, Jurisdiction of UK Courts Over European Patents, Arrow Declarations, Patent Infringement, Revocation Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FUJIFILM KYOWA BIOLOGICS CO., LTD.
Claimant
ABBVIE BIOTECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Litigation / Interlocutory Applications (application to Amend Claim and Strike Out)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the UK court has jurisdiction to grant a declaration that the claimant's biosimilar product would have been obvious or anticipated at the priority date of certain AbbVie patents and divisionals (Arrow declaration)
- 2 Whether such a declaration is barred by section 74 of the Patents Act 1977
- 3 Whether the declaration sought would serve a useful commercial purpose
Ratio Decidendi
The UK Patents Court has jurisdiction to grant a declaration that the claimant's biosimilar product would have been obvious or anticipated at the priority date of the relevant AbbVie patents and divisionals, as such relief is not barred by section 74 of the Patents Act 1977 and serves a useful commercial purpose in clearing the way for product launch. The declaration sought is sufficiently defined, relates only to the claimant's own product, and does not usurp the EPO's function. The circumstances are sufficiently unusual to justify the exercise of discretion to allow the claim to proceed.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out dismissed; application to amend claim allowed
Orders
- AbbVie's application to strike out the claim for declaratory relief is dismissed
- FKB's application to amend the Claim Form and Particulars of Claim is allowed in the form currently pursued
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment