Chapman & Ors, R. v
The judge misdirected the jury on the third element of misconduct in public office by failing to properly explain how to assess the seriousness threshold, specifically by not directing the jury to consider whether the conduct harmed the public interest; this misdirection rendered the convictions unsafe and required them to be quashed.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: ABC; Applicant: EFG; Applicant: IJK; Applicant: Ryan Sabey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Applications for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Convictions quashed for ABC, EFG, and IJK; leave to appeal granted for Ryan Sabey; liberty to apply for Ryan Sabey.
- Legal Topics
- Misconduct in Public Office, Aiding and Abetting, Conspiracy, Jury Directions, Mens Rea
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
ABC
Applicant
EFG
Applicant
IJK
Applicant
Ryan Sabey
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Applications for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge's direction on the threshold for misconduct in public office was correct
- 2 Whether the judge's direction on the mens rea of aiders and abettors was correct
- 3 Mens rea required for conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office
Ratio Decidendi
The judge misdirected the jury on the third element of misconduct in public office by failing to properly explain how to assess the seriousness threshold, specifically by not directing the jury to consider whether the conduct harmed the public interest; this misdirection rendered the convictions unsafe and required them to be quashed.
Court Disposition
Convictions quashed for ABC, EFG, and IJK; leave to appeal granted for Ryan Sabey; liberty to apply for Ryan Sabey.
Orders
- Convictions of ABC, EFG, and IJK quashed.
- Leave to appeal granted for Ryan Sabey.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment