Miah, R. v
The evidence of the victim's post-event reaction was admissible in this case due to the concrete basis provided by the defence's assertion of a staged kidnapping, making it relevant and helpful to the jury. The sentences imposed were reduced to reflect the absence of physical violence and the respective roles and antecedents of the appellants.
- Parties
- Appellant: Abdal Miah; Appellant: Liban Habib Mohammed; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- appeals against conviction dismissed; appeals against sentence allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Kidnapping, Blackmail, Evidence Admissibility, Sentencing, Public Nuisance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdal Miah
Appellant
Liban Habib Mohammed
Appellant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 admissibility of evidence regarding victim's post-event reaction
- 2 safety of conviction
- 3 appropriateness of sentences imposed
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of the victim's post-event reaction was admissible in this case due to the concrete basis provided by the defence's assertion of a staged kidnapping, making it relevant and helpful to the jury. The sentences imposed were reduced to reflect the absence of physical violence and the respective roles and antecedents of the appellants.
Court Disposition
appeals against conviction dismissed; appeals against sentence allowed in part
Orders
- sentence for kidnapping reduced from 15 years to 12 years for Abdal Miah
- sentence for blackmail reduced from 11 years to 9 years for Abdal Miah
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment