R v Abdul Raheem Howe
The grounds for appeal against conviction and sentence are without merit; the trial judge's findings and sentencing were within discretion and not manifestly excessive. The extended licence period was justified by the ongoing risk posed by the applicant. The victim surcharge was not pronounced in open court and must be removed from the record.
- Parties
- Applicant: Abdul Raheem Howe; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewal Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- applications for leave to appeal conviction and sentence dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Kidnap, False Imprisonment, Perverting the Course of Justice, Extended Sentence, Dangerousness, Victim Surcharge
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdul Raheem Howe
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewal Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 whether leave to appeal conviction should be granted
- 2 whether leave to appeal sentence should be granted
- 3 whether the extended sentence and licence period were manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds for appeal against conviction and sentence are without merit; the trial judge's findings and sentencing were within discretion and not manifestly excessive. The extended licence period was justified by the ongoing risk posed by the applicant. The victim surcharge was not pronounced in open court and must be removed from the record.
Court Disposition
applications for leave to appeal conviction and sentence dismissed
Orders
- extension of time granted for applications
- record to be amended to remove victim surcharge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment