Bouhadi v Breish [2016] EWHC 602 (Comm) (17 March 2016)
Given the FCO's formal communication that HMG recognises neither the Tobruk nor Tripoli governments and supports the establishment of a Government of National Accord, it would be contrary to principle and premature for the court to rule on the chairmanship of the LIA at this time; public policy and the government's stated position require judicial restraint.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 602 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Hassan Bouhadi; Defendant: Abdulmagid Breish
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim / Adjournment Decision at Trial
- Outcome
- Adjourned with liberty to restore
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Governments, Sovereign Wealth Funds, Receivership, Judicial Restraint
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hassan Bouhadi
Claimant
Abdulmagid Breish
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Adjournment Decision at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Which regime in Libya should the English court treat as the government for purposes of the Libyan Investment Authority's leadership?
- 2 Should the court determine the chairmanship of the LIA in light of the UK's position and international developments?
Ratio Decidendi
Given the FCO's formal communication that HMG recognises neither the Tobruk nor Tripoli governments and supports the establishment of a Government of National Accord, it would be contrary to principle and premature for the court to rule on the chairmanship of the LIA at this time; public policy and the government's stated position require judicial restraint.
Court Disposition
Adjourned with liberty to restore
Orders
- Proceedings adjourned with liberty to restore
- Costs reserved
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment