Abeeso Security Services Limited v The Pensions Regulator

Abeeso Security Services Limited v The Pensions Regulator

The Appellant failed to rebut the presumption of service and did not provide sufficient evidence of incapacity or extreme ill health to justify non-compliance; the Regulator acted appropriately and the penalty imposed was proportionate.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Abeeso Security Services Limited; Respondent: The Pensions Regulator
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 October 2022
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; penalty confirmed
Legal Topics
Fixed Penalty Notice, Compliance Notice, Presumption of Service, Employer Duties
Pensions Regulation Administrative Law Fixed Penalty Notice Compliance Notice Presumption of Service Employer Duties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abeeso Security Services Limited

Appellant

The Pensions Regulator

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Compliance Notice was properly served
  2. 2 Whether ill health constituted a valid excuse for non-compliance
  3. 3 Whether the Fixed Penalty Notice was just and appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The Appellant failed to rebut the presumption of service and did not provide sufficient evidence of incapacity or extreme ill health to justify non-compliance; the Regulator acted appropriately and the penalty imposed was proportionate.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; penalty confirmed

Orders

  • Reference dismissed
  • Matter remitted to Regulator