Matière SAS v ABM Precast Solutions LTD
Matière SAS breached its contractual duty of good faith under both the Consortium and Collaboration Agreements by privately undermining the Scunthorpe factory proposal and pursuing alternative arrangements with EKJV without ABM's knowledge. However, these breaches were not causative of ABM's loss of chance to win the Green Tunnels Project, as EKJV's dissatisfaction with ABM and the Scunthorpe proposal was independently established and would have led to the same outcome regardless of Matière's conduct. ABM was also unable to demonstrate it could have fulfilled the contract due to lack of funding. Therefore, ABM's counterclaim fails for lack of causation.
- Parties
- Claimant: Matière SAS; Defendant: ABM Precast Solutions Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; counterclaim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Good Faith in Contracts, Joint Venture Agreements, Breach of Contract, Loss of Chance, Account of Profits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matière SAS
Claimant
ABM Precast Solutions Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Matière SAS breached its contractual duty of good faith under the Consortium and Collaboration Agreements with ABM Precast Solutions Ltd
- 2 Whether such breaches caused ABM to lose a real and substantial chance of winning the Green Tunnels Project subcontract
- 3 Whether Matière was liable for an account of profits for entering into subsequent contracts with EKJV without ABM
Ratio Decidendi
Matière SAS breached its contractual duty of good faith under both the Consortium and Collaboration Agreements by privately undermining the Scunthorpe factory proposal and pursuing alternative arrangements with EKJV without ABM's knowledge. However, these breaches were not causative of ABM's loss of chance to win the Green Tunnels Project, as EKJV's dissatisfaction with ABM and the Scunthorpe proposal was independently established and would have led to the same outcome regardless of Matière's conduct. ABM was also unable to demonstrate it could have fulfilled the contract due to lack of funding. Therefore, ABM's counterclaim fails for lack of causation.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; counterclaim dismissed
Orders
- Judgment for Matière SAS for the full sum claimed (£373,295.06)
- Counterclaim by ABM Precast Solutions Ltd dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment