R v ABQ
The sentence was manifestly excessive given the appellant's mental disorders and reduced culpability; the appropriate custodial term after guilty plea was 19 years with an 8-year extended licence, but the finding of dangerousness and the imposition of a penal sentence rather than a hospital order were justified given the gravity of the offences, need for punishment, and public protection.
- Parties
- Appellant: ABQ; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Mental Health and Capacity, Dangerousness, Hospital Orders, Extended Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ABQ
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the finding of dangerousness was justified
- 3 Whether a hospital order under section 37/41 Mental Health Act 1983 should be substituted for a custodial sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence was manifestly excessive given the appellant's mental disorders and reduced culpability; the appropriate custodial term after guilty plea was 19 years with an 8-year extended licence, but the finding of dangerousness and the imposition of a penal sentence rather than a hospital order were justified given the gravity of the offences, need for punishment, and public protection.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentences on counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 14, 15, 16 and 17 quashed and substituted with reduced concurrent extended sentences (count 1: 19 years' custody + 8 years' extended licence; counts 2 and 4: 18 years' custody + 8 years' extended licence; counts 3, 14-17: 17 years' custody + 8 years' extended licence; count 11: 2...
- Sentences on counts 12, 13, 18, 19, and 20 and all ancillary orders remain as imposed below
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment