Axis Corporate Capital UK II Ltd & Ors v ABSA Group Ltd & Ors
The excess layer reinsurance contracts contain exclusive jurisdiction clauses in favour of the courts of England and Wales, and proceedings in South Africa on those contracts are in breach of contract and should be restrained by anti-suit injunction. The primary layer reinsurance contract does not contain or imply an exclusive jurisdiction clause; proceedings in South Africa on that contract are not vexatious, oppressive, or unconscionable and should not be restrained.
- Parties
- Claimant: AXIS Corporate Capital UK II Limited; Defendant: ABSA Group Limited; Defendant: ABSA Bank Limited; Defendant: ABSA Nominees Proprietary Limited; Defendant: ABSA Manx Insurance Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Return Date Hearing on Interim Anti Suit Injunction
- Outcome
- Partial continuation of anti-suit injunction
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunction, Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses, Reinsurance Contracts, Interpretation of Jurisdiction Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AXIS Corporate Capital UK II Limited
Claimant
ABSA Group Limited
Defendant
ABSA Bank Limited
Defendant
ABSA Nominees Proprietary Limited
Defendant
ABSA Manx Insurance Company Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Return Date Hearing on Interim Anti Suit Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the South African proceedings breach exclusive jurisdiction agreements in the reinsurance contracts
- 2 Whether the primary layer reinsurance contract contains or implies an exclusive jurisdiction clause
- 3 Whether the excess layer reinsurance contracts contain exclusive jurisdiction clauses
Ratio Decidendi
The excess layer reinsurance contracts contain exclusive jurisdiction clauses in favour of the courts of England and Wales, and proceedings in South Africa on those contracts are in breach of contract and should be restrained by anti-suit injunction. The primary layer reinsurance contract does not contain or imply an exclusive jurisdiction clause; proceedings in South Africa on that contract are not vexatious, oppressive, or unconscionable and should not be restrained.
Court Disposition
Partial continuation of anti-suit injunction
Orders
- South African proceedings on the Excess Layer Reinsurances are restrained by anti-suit injunction
- South African proceedings on the Primary Layer Reinsurances are permitted to continue
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment