Mansha, R. v
The sentence of 6 years' imprisonment was within the appropriate range given the seriousness of the offence and the relevant circumstances; it was not manifestly excessive.
- Parties
- Applicant: Abu Baker Mansha; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Terrorism, Sentencing, Possession of Information for Terrorism, Forfeiture of Firearm
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Abu Baker Mansha
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 6 years' imprisonment for possession of information likely to be useful to terrorism was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 6 years' imprisonment was within the appropriate range given the seriousness of the offence and the relevant circumstances; it was not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- sentence of 6 years' imprisonment upheld
- period spent on remand to count towards sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment