Excel Polymers Ltd. v Achillesmark Ltd.
The standstill agreement was a straightforward extension of the limitation period, first to 10 May and then to 10 June 2004. There was no agreement or necessary implication that proceedings could be commenced after that date. There was no common assumption or representation sufficient to found estoppel. The claim is statute barred.
- Parties
- Claimant: Excel Polymers Limited; Defendant: Achillesmark Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Determination of Preliminary Issue on Limitation
- Outcome
- Claim statute barred; preliminary issue determined in favour of Defendant
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Standstill Agreements, Estoppel, Professional Negligence by Insurance Brokers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Excel Polymers Limited
Claimant
Achillesmark Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Determination of Preliminary Issue on Limitation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the standstill agreement extended the limitation period to include the date proceedings were issued
- 2 Whether the Defendant is estopped by convention from relying on limitation
- 3 Whether the Defendant is estopped by promissory estoppel from relying on limitation
Ratio Decidendi
The standstill agreement was a straightforward extension of the limitation period, first to 10 May and then to 10 June 2004. There was no agreement or necessary implication that proceedings could be commenced after that date. There was no common assumption or representation sufficient to found estoppel. The claim is statute barred.
Court Disposition
Claim statute barred; preliminary issue determined in favour of Defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment