Craft Development SCI v Actis LLP & Ors [2025] EWHC 2744 (KB) ( 27 October 2025)
There was a material change of circumstances only to the extent that expert evidence on Cameroonian law was no longer required, justifying a reduction in the security for costs by £74,000. However, the Claimant failed to show a high probability of success or misstatement justifying revocation of the security order. The costs order should not be varied as no material change occurred, and detailed assessment should await trial conclusion. The Claimant's continuing breach of the security order justified an unless order: unless £226,000 is paid within six weeks, the claim will be struck out.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 2744 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Craft Development SCI (suing by its provisional administrator Mr Ngoua Elembe Hiob); Defendant: Actis LLP; Defendant: Actis Africa Real Estate Fund 3 aka Actis Africa Real Estate 3 LP; Defendant: Actis Africa Real Estate 3A LP aka Actis Africa Real Estate Fund 3; Defendant: Actis Africa Real Estate 3 Co-Investment Scheme LP aka Actis Africa Real Estate Fund 3; Defendant: Actis Africa Real Estate 3C LP aka Actis Africa Real Estate Fund 3; Defendant: Actis GP LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Civil Claim (king's Bench Division) / Interlocutory Applications Regarding Security for Costs and Case Management Orders
- Outcome
- Applications to revoke or vary the security for costs and costs orders largely refused; security for costs reduced by £74,000; unless order granted.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Case Management, Variation/revocation of Orders, Costs Assessment, Breach of Contract, Fraud, Unlawful Means Conspiracy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Craft Development SCI (suing by its provisional administrator Mr Ngoua Elembe Hiob)
Claimant
Actis LLP
Defendant
Actis Africa Real Estate Fund 3 aka Actis Africa Real Estate 3 LP
Defendant
Actis Africa Real Estate 3A LP aka Actis Africa Real Estate Fund 3
Defendant
Actis Africa Real Estate 3 Co-Investment Scheme LP aka Actis Africa Real Estate Fund 3
Defendant
Actis Africa Real Estate 3C LP aka Actis Africa Real Estate Fund 3
Defendant
Actis GP LLP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
High Court Civil Claim (king's Bench Division) / Interlocutory Applications Regarding Security for Costs and Case Management Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the security for costs order should be revoked or varied under CPR 3.1(7)
- 2 Whether the costs order should be varied under CPR 3.1(7)
- 3 Whether an unless order should be made requiring payment of outstanding security for costs
Ratio Decidendi
There was a material change of circumstances only to the extent that expert evidence on Cameroonian law was no longer required, justifying a reduction in the security for costs by £74,000. However, the Claimant failed to show a high probability of success or misstatement justifying revocation of the security order. The costs order should not be varied as no material change occurred, and detailed assessment should await trial conclusion. The Claimant's continuing breach of the security order justified an unless order: unless £226,000 is paid within six weeks, the claim will be struck out.
Court Disposition
Applications to revoke or vary the security for costs and costs orders largely refused; security for costs reduced by £74,000; unless order granted.
Orders
- Security for costs reduced from £300,000 to £226,000.
- Unless the Claimant pays £226,000 within six weeks, the claim will be struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment