R. v E
The psychologist's evidence was properly admitted as relevant to the alleged offences, and the jury directions were sufficient; the failure to highlight specific inconsistencies did not render the verdict unsafe.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Adam E
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Evidence Admissibility, Jury Directions, Appeal Grounds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Adam E
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 admissibility of psychologist's evidence
- 2 adequacy of jury directions regarding inconsistencies
- 3 safety of conviction
Ratio Decidendi
The psychologist's evidence was properly admitted as relevant to the alleged offences, and the jury directions were sufficient; the failure to highlight specific inconsistencies did not render the verdict unsafe.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- conviction upheld
- sentence affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment